Legal Opinion

Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Carson City Texaco, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1985No. 71235, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

This case requires us to decide whether the insurer of a motor vehicle is responsible under the no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq., to pay benefits for property damage arising out of the maintenance of a motor vehicle in the course of a business of maintaining motor vehicles. We hold that such insurer is responsible.

I

Defendant Carson City Texaco, Inc., owned a heating oil delivery truck which it delivered to Tank Truck Service Company, Inc., for maintenance. A fire occurred, causing damage to Tank Truck’s property. Plaintiff Michigan Mutual Insurance Co., Tank…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Carson City Texaco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Husted v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance Group v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Jarrad v. Integon National InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API