Legal Opinion

Romero v. Brady

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided May 24, 1991No. Civ. 89-0412 (JAF), 90-1117 (JAF) and 90-1173 (JAF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FUSTE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are federal employees performing their duties in Puerto Rico. 1 Plaintiffs are all recipients of a Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA), a benefit paid to federal government employees stationed at locations outside the continental United States. The COLA in Puerto Rico adds 10% to some categories of federal government salaries. The COLA is exempt from taxation under federal law, but is taxable under the laws of Puerto Rico. Pursuant to an agreement between the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Treasury Department of the United States, federal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Rodríguez v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  3. Cintron-Ortiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
  4. Rodríguez v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API