Legal Opinion

Troxell v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 2013No. 107885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REIF, V.C.J.

1 1 This case concerns the monthly subsidy provided by the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS) to adoptive parents of special needs children. The controversy in this regard stems from a decision by DHS to pay foster parents of special needs children a higher subsidy amount than is paid to adoptive parents. DHS has set the monthly foster placement subsidy at $365.00 per child, while capping the monthly adoptive placement subsidy at $310.50 per child.

T2 Kelly and Tina Troxell, the adoptive parents of two special needs children, challenged this two-tier subsidy system through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lester v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Dobson Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. DOBSON TELEPHONE CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. CORPORATION COMM.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. SPANE v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API