Legal Opinion

Board of Elections v. State Ex Rel. Schneider

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1934No. 24646PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

The order of the parties is . reversed in this court. The Board of Elections, being plaintiff in error, will be referred to as plaintiff, and William Schneider, defendant in error, as defendant.

The Court of Appeals held that House Bill No. 331 (now Sections 2750 and 2750-1, General Code) is unconstitutional in all its parts, and that the adoption of the new Article X of the Constitution of Ohio, commonly known as the County Home Rule Amendment, at the November election, 1933, in no wise affects the rights of William Schneider, the relator in that court.

House Bill No. 331 is referred to in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geiger v. GeigerOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Christy v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Wilson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Spencer v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HodgeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jelm v. JelmOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Richman v. LighamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. Sandusky County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Stone v. Goolsby, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API