Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY A. GRAVES, No. 2:25-cv-02558-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PACIFIC GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Kimberly A. Graves proceeds pro se in this matter and asserts claims concerning 19 a utility pole located on her property. Until a relatively recent survey, both Plaintiff and 20 Defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG&E”) believed the pole was located on an 21 adjacent parcel. This case accordingly concerns the question…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.