Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1971No. 26PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendant by Assignment of Error. No. 3 contends the trial court committed error by denying his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty interposed at the close of the State’s case. The evidence was direct, complete and made out a strong case of armed robbery as defined by G.S. 14-87. State v. Miller, 268 N.C. 532, 151 S.E. 2d 47; State v. Carter, 265 N.C. 626, 144 S.E. 2d 826; State v. Stephens, 262 N.C. 45, 136 S.E. 2d 209. The defendant’s motion to dismiss was properly denied.

The defendant, by his Assignment of Error No. 4, challenges as error the court’s failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API