Legal Opinion

Ward v. George

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 26, 1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 87 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM FLOYD CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Civil Code, secs. 106, 108, 109. 14 Ben. Mon., 647; Pottinger vs. Mayfield. 3 Metcalfe, 459. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 108. 3 Metcalfe, 460; Fernold vs. Speers. CITED— • Civil Code, sec. 108. 13 Ben. Mon., 167; Kennedy's adm’r vs. Davenport,

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellee sued three defendants as joint trespassers as to personal property, in the Floyd circuit court, had service of process on two of them in Floyd county, and on *358Ward in Carter county. The jury found for the two defendants served in Floyd and against Ward. After the verdict, and before judgment, Ward moved to dismiss the case as to himself, because not served in Floyd, and no judgment could be rendered against any defendant served in said county; which motion was overruled and judgment rendered against him on the verdict, and -from which…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. Beeler's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Knoxville Banking & Trust Co. v. MershonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. W. L. Lyons & Co. v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API