Legal Opinion

Elkins v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 21, 1937No. 6198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, a citizen of the United States, residing in Pennsylvania, filed his federal income lax return for 1931. It disclosed credits and deductions by reason of taxes deducted and paid directly to the United Kingdom by companies from dividends on stock owned by him. During the year, by reason of his stock holdings in British companies, he received the net amount of $23,993.72 in dividends, such dividends being accompanied by certifica*536tion that $7,017.11 had been deducted and paid directly to the British Government.1

Under authority of section 131 (a) (b) of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. McFeely v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. & A. Tool & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Schuh Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Abbot Laboratories International Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
  4. State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API