Fremont Indemnity Co. v. New England Reinsurance Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
In this case we must settle another conflict between two separate insurance policies containing similar “other insurance” provisions. Claims under each policy arise from the same alleged incident of legal malpractice. New England Reinsurance Company petitions for review of the court of appeals’ decision holding that Fremont Indemnity Company’s policy excludes coverage for the conduct in question. 165 Ariz. 521, 799 P.2d 862.
We granted review pursuant to rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, to determine whether language in both policies may be construed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Home Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Regal Homes, Inc. v. CNA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Planet Insurance Co. v. ErtzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re Popkin & Stern, Debtor. Old Republic Insurance Company v. Cynthia Bitting Lynn G. Carey William E. Cooper Jeffrey S. Gershman Bennett S. Keller Steven H. Leyton James R. Nangle, Jr. John O. Niemann, Pat Simons Steven M. Stone Alan N. Zvibleman Thomas P. Rosenfeld Donald L. Wolff and the Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Company, in Re Popkin & Stern, Debtor. Old Republic Insurance Company v. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.