Legal Opinion

People ex rel. O.J.S.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1992No. Nos. 91CA0343, 91CA0344, 91CA0347 and 91CA0348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge METZGER.

In these consolidated appeals, D.A.S., mother, and D.A.S., Sr., father, appeal a judgment of the juvenile court which terminated their parent-child legal relationships with their children, O.J.S., A.S.S., and D.A.S., Jr. We affirm.

I

The mother contends that the court erred in allowing the testimony of a psychologist and in admitting his report into evidence at the termination hearing. She argues that the testimony and report were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege. We disagree.

The purpose of the attorney-client privilege is to secure the orderly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. A. M. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Losavio v. District Court in & for Tenth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Koontz v. RosenerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re A.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Rocky Mountain Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing Ex Rel. RizzutoColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In re S.M-LColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People ex rel. J.W. and N.WColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. In re A.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API