Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V. Dannie C. Brashear

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 19, 2024No. 86610-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 86610-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART DANNIE CHRISTOPHER BRASHEAR, Appellant. BIRK, J. — Dannie Brashear appeals his conviction, arguing, among other things, that the trial court violated his constitutional right to confer with counsel where he appeared at all pretrial hearings remotely, while his defense counsel was at a different location. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that Brashear did not object to this arrangement in the trial court and cannot raise this issue for the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API