Legal Opinion
Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 29, 2016No. 11-201CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1498; Claim Construction; Ordinary and Customary Meaning; Prosecution History Disclaimer.
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff, Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. (“Ross-Hime”), claims that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) infringed two patents — U.S. Patent Nos. 5,967,580 (“the ’580 Patent”) and 6,658,962 (“the ’962 Patent”) (collectively “patents-in-suit”) through NASA’s use and manufacture of the robotic hand-like manipulators in Robonaut 1 and Robonaut 2, two anthropomorphic robotics systems. This…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- C.R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Medline Industries, LP v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- ViroPharma Biologics LLC v. CSL Behring LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019