Agency of Canadian Cab & Foundry Co. v. Pennsylvania Iron Works Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; W. H. Seward Thompson, Judge. Two actions at law by the Agency of Canadian Car ,& Foundry Gompany, Limited, against the Pennsylvania Iron Works Company. From the judgments, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This controversy arose out of war contracts. Canadian Car & Foundry Company, Limited, a corporation of Canada, had a contract with- the Imperial Russian government for the manufacture of 2,500,000 shrapnel shells for three-inch quick-firing field guns. , Finding it impracticable to turn out shells in this number from its works in Canada, this corporation came to the United States and entered into many subcontracts for finishing shells with concerns having manufacturing plants of diverse kinds. One of these was the Pennsylvania Iron Works Company, a corporation of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Easton v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1819
- Powell v. HinsdaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
3Cited by8 opinions
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Zig Zag Spring Co. v. Comfort Spring CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- King v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Quinlan v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Jackson v. FrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.