Coyer v. Hyster Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In order for plaintiffs to succeed in this negligence action, it *921must be first demonstrated that defendants owed them a legal duty (D’Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d 76, 87; Eiseman v State of New York, 70 NY2d 175, 187; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 437). "In the absence of duty, there is no breach and without a breach there is no liability” (Pulka v Edelman, 40 NY2d 781, 782, rearg denied 41 NY2d 901). It is the responsibility of the courts in fixing the orbit of duty " ’to limit the legal consequences of wrongs to a controllable degree’ ” (Strauss v Belle Realty Co., 65 NY2d 399, 402, quoting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Coyer v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Moore v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997