Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997Published

1Dissent

Balio, J. (dissenting).

Supreme Court properly determined that the first cause of action of the complaint states a cause of action for negligent supervision and training of bank employees. Thus, I respectfully dissent and vote to affirm.

The complaint alleges that, on October 25, 1993, Benjamin Moore (plaintiff) maintained checking and savings accounts with defendant bank and that, while he was transacting business at the Henrietta branch of the bank, the assistant manager of that bank branch erroneously reported to the police that plaintiff possessed a hand gun and, as a result, the police…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API