Legal Opinion

Baltas v. Snyder

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01487Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOE BALTAS, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:24cv1487 (VAB) DAVID SNYDER, et al, Respondents. RULING ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Joe Baltas’s motion to reconsider the Court’s initial review order (“IRO”). ECF No. 25. For the following reasons, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court entered an IRO permitting Mr. Baltas to proceed on his claims alleging that state officials violated his rights under the First, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and RLUIPA. See IRO, ECF No. 22 at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Range Road Music, Inc. v. Music Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. SPGGC, Inc. v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API