Legal Opinion

Ida B. Harrington v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 27, 1989No. 88-1473, 88-2961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee Ida B. Harrington is the beneficiary under an employee life insurance policy issued by the defendant-appellant New England Mutual Life Insurance Company (New England). Ricardo Edmunds, Harrington’s son, was the named insured under the policy. The policy provided for a $15,000 basic death benefit with an additional $15,000 benefit in case of accidental death. New England paid the $15,000 basic death benefit to Harrington upon Edmunds’ death, but refused to pay the additional accidental death benefit. Harrington filed suit seeking recovery…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Marsh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Rodgers v. Reserve Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Russell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. McAllister v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ronnie Rice v. James Burks and Mark HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  3. Brown v. American International Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991
  4. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API