Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesus Rosales-Bruno

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 19, 2015No. 12-15089PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ED CARNES, Chief Judge:

This is the second appeal to come before us involving a sentence imposed on Jesus Rosales-Bruno because of his conviction for illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In the first appeal we vacated his original sentence after concluding the district court had erred in finding that his prior Florida conviction for false imprisonment qualified as a “crime of violence” conviction for enhancement purposes under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). United States v. Rosales-Bruno, 676 F.3d 1017, 1024 (11th Cir.2012)…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. United States v. James DixonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Trinity Rolando Cabezas-MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Ricardo Lenin Osorio-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Michael Albert FociaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API