Muma v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals1 affirming judgment non obstante veredicto for defendants Ernest Brown and Edna Brown.
Stanley D. Muma is a minor. At tbe time he sustained the injuries for which these suits were brought, he was 3 years old.
Larry Brown at the time of the occurrence of the events complained of was 14 years old. Ernest and Edna Brown are his parents. Stanley E. Muma is the minor plaintiff’s father. Guardian Betty Muma is his mother. Two actions were instituted; one was by the injured minor’s father, the other by the guardian. They were consolidated for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Krisher v. DuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Cole v. BoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Fitzpatrick v. RitzenheinMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- ZUGEL BY ZUGEL v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- American States Insurance v. AlbinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dortman v. LesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Ensign v. CraterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Dortman v. LesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.