Legal Opinion

Shorrock v. Shorrock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1936No. 25900. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This appeal is from an interlocutory decree of divorce. The only contention argued by appellant in his brief is that the court had not acquired jurisdiction over his person. No bill of exceptions or statement, of facts has been certified to this court.

In the trial court, the appellant first appeared specially by motion to quash and challenged the court’s jurisdiction, upon the ground that no proper service of summons and complaint had been made upon him. In support of his motion, he filed several affidavits. At the hearing upon the motion, the respondent filed controverting affidavits. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Thurman v. KildallWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Marsh v. West Fir Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Webb v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Glen Park Associates, L.L.C. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Witenberg v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Glen Park Associates, LLC v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API