Legal Opinion
Pacheco v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 7, 2025No. 2:22-cv-11927Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTHONY PACHECO, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-11927 Plaintiffs, HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [58] AND STAYING CASE Ford moved to compel some of the Plaintiffs’ claims to mandatory arbitration. ECF No. 58. Because an arbitrator must determine the claims’ arbitrability, the Court will grant the motion and stay the case pending a determination of arbitrability as to the six Arbitration Plaintiffs. BACKGROUND1 A. Factual History…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.