Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Becker, 22107 (5-2-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2008No. 22107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Joseph Becker appeals from his conviction for Failure to Obey the Legal Order of a Housing Inspector, in violation of Section 93.05 of the Revised Code of General Ordinances of the City of Dayton (hereinafter R.C.G.O.).

Becker claims that the City failed to properly serve notice of the housing violations. He also claims that the evidence in the record does not support the conviction. He further contends that he cannot be held criminally liable with regard to the property, since he is not the owner. He argues that if he is found to be an owner under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Dayton v. SheibenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Thaler, 22579 (10-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Robinson, 22646 (2-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API