Wright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a conviction and judgment on a five count indictment under sections 2705 and 2707 of Title 22 of the District of Columbia Code (pandering and related offenses). Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court improperly restricted his cross-examination of the complaining witness. While cross-examination is a matter of right, Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 51 S.Ct. 218, 75 L.Ed. 624, its extent can and must be reasonably controlled by the court in the interest of a fair and orderly trial. “In re spect of such things as needless protraction, conduct of an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Abe BenderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Thomas Howard, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Lewis v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Christoffel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.