Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Douglas Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1909No. 1776PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint, from city court of Douglas — Judge Roan. February 36, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

None of the assignments of error in this case can be intelligently determined without a consideration of the evidence. There is no proper brief of the evidence, but what purports to be a brief consists of the oral and documentary evidence in full, extensively interspersed with objections to testimony, and with statements and arguments of counsel, colloquies between court and counsel, and' motions to nonsuit and to direct a verdict, with the rulings of the court, etc., etc. The imperfections above indicated’ were not corrected by a motion to strike from the brief “everything- contained therein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hathcock v. McGouirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Hirsch & Co. v. Dozier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Pinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Wrigitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lanham v. PresleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API