Legal Opinion
Wrigitt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 14, 1908No. 944PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Indictment for misdemeanor, from city court of Savannah — ■ Judge Norwood. December 21, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. None of the assignments of error made in the motion for a new trial can be intelligently considered or determined without reference to the evidence; and there is no brief of the evidence as required by the statute and the repeated decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court. Hirsch v. Dozier Lumber Co. 2 Ga. App. 520 (58 S. E. 786), and citations.
2. What purports to be a brief of the evidence seems to be merely a transcript of the stenographer’s notes, extensively interspersed with objee*664tions to testimony, statements and arguments of counsel, and colloquies between .court and counsel,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hathcock v. McGouirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Culver v. SilverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Hirsch & Co. v. Dozier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oconee Oil Refining Co. v. Planters Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Howard Piano Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Johnson v. Douglas Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909