Legal Opinion

Sikora v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 6, 1938:

Martin, J.

The appellant makes the following assignment of errors:

1. The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

2. The court erred in denying defendant’s alternative motions after verdict:

a. To change the answers of the jury to certain questions in the special verdict, and for judgment upon such verdict as so amended.

b. To set aside the verdict and for a new trial:(1) Because the verdict is contrary to law and to the evidence.(2) Because the percentages of negligence attributed to the respective parties are grossly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Grasser v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gauthier v. CarbonneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hendrickson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Great Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Post v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gvora v. CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API