Legal Opinion
ACOSTA HIDALGO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3555PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 103
(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3555 In re Victor ACOSTA HIDALGO, Respondent File A36 822 586 - New York Decided March 8, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Because the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Immigration Judges lack jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for naturalization, removal proceedings may only be terminated pursuant to
8 C.F.R. § 1239.2(f) (2006) where the Department of Homeland Security has presented an affirmative communication attesting to an alien’s prima facie eligibility for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PangilinanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States Immigration & Naturalization Service v. HibiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- VELARDEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Shomberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of HomeLand SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Hernandez De Anderson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Johnson v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Saba-Bakare v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- OGUNFUYE v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.