Legal Opinion

Smith v. Tieman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 19, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CHANCERY COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The difficulty in sustaining the judgment below arises from the manner in which it is alleged this purchase money note was discharged or paid by the appellee. That Davidson was the agent to sell was clearly shown; but that he had the right to receive, in payment for the notes, a discharge of his own liabilities is not authorized from any testimony in the case.

It is shown here that the agent who sold the property was indebted to the appellee for goods or groceries, and agreed that these groceries should be settled for in that manner. There is no proof showing any such…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elbert v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API