Carney v. Stanley

In this suit by appellee Stanley against one Will Perkins (on a promissory note), a writ of attachment sued out by the former was levied upon a motortruck belonging to the latter, who replevied same in the way provided by the statute (article 292, R. S. 1925), giving a bond with appellants Carney and Allen as his sureties. Aft-erwards the writ of attachment was quashed by the court because it was issued without an affidavit to support it as required by the statute. Articles 275 and 276, R. S. 1925. On a trial before tl^e court without a jury judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor against…