Cover v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Cover charged the Chicago Eye Shield Company with infringement of six United States patents of which he was the owner and patentee. The patent numbers, with the several dates of application and issue, and the claims involved, are in the margin1 and they will be separately referred to hereafter by the last two digits of their respective numbers. The answer was invalidity and non-infringement.
The court held that claim 4 of No. 95 was invalid; that claim 2 of No. 30 was infringed but invalid on account of anticipation by prior use; that claim 3 of No. 30 and claims 2 and 3…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- WM. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. Falls City Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Michael A. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Lincoln Stores, Inc. v. Nashua Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Hollywood-Maxwell Co. v. Street's of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Cover v. Chicago Eye Shield Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Gagnier Fibre Products Co. v. Fourslides, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.