Legal Opinion

Pryor v. McCafferty

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 4951, 4952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

•Error from Distiict (Vurt, Oklahoma County; AY. R. Taylor, Judge. Action by D. C- Pryor against Charles McCafferty, County Treasurer, and the Board of County Commissioners, consolidated (with action by C. D. Andrews against Charles - McCafferty, County Treasurer. Judgments for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAAHS, C.

This action has been consolidated with cause No. 4952, O. D. Andrews against Charles McCafferty, and the opinion herein will toe the opinion also in cause No. 4952, supra.

In this cause, No. 4951, the property of the plaintiff in error designated in the petition in this cause, consisting of about 50 acres of land, more accurately described in the petition herein, within tire corporate limits of Oklahoma City, but which had not been subdivided into blocks and lots, etc., was assessed for taxation for the year 1911 by the assessor at $45,000, and no effort was made by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Carroll, Brough Robinson v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Enid v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Adams v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API