Legal Opinion

Chirban v. Veglia

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 21, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFurnari, J.

This is a report of the allowance of the plaintiff-therapist's motion for summary judgment against the defendant-lawyer for payment of a bill for services rendered to the lawyer's client.

*21The complaint was in five counts: counts I, II and III were against the client Michael J. Veglia (“Veglia”) and counts IV and V were against the lawyer, Joseph P. Márchese, Jr. (“Márchese”). Count IV was based upon an express, written agreement, captioned “Doctor's Lien”, that Márchese would pay the plaintiff for services rendered to Veglia and that such payment would be taken out of any settlement he secured…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Yakubowicz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Zarum v. Brass Mill Materials Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Basbanes v. BoncoreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
  2. A.G.S. Physical Therapy, Inc. v. MolloyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API