Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Ryan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This action is for divorce. The defendant denies the charges and pleads as a defense (but not as a counterclaim) the prior adultery of the plaintiff. Upon the trial I found both parties guilty of the acts charged. The defendant’s act was of rather recent occurrence, while the plaintiff’s act occurred more than five years prior to the commencement of the action and was known by the defendant to have been committed at the time of its commission. The parties have not lived together since the plaintiff committed his offense.

The legal question is whether the misconduct of the plaintiff occurring…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  3. Morrell v. MorrellNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Morrell v. MorrellNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Leseuer v. LeseuerNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of LevineNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  2. Mays v. MaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Fleischer v. FleischerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Schlachet v. SchlachetNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API