Legal Opinion

Kopanski v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 26, 1986No. 13-85-405-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at thirty years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $10,-000.00.

In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred when it overruled a motion for continuance. In determining whether a trial court erred in overruling a motion for continuance, the appellate court examines the record of the proceedings to determine if appellant was ably represented by counsel throughout the trial. Jimenez v. State, 717 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1986).

Appellant’s,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Sanne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Irvine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  2. Reyna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Benitez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API