Kopanski v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at thirty years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $10,-000.00.
In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred when it overruled a motion for continuance. In determining whether a trial court erred in overruling a motion for continuance, the appellate court examines the record of the proceedings to determine if appellant was ably represented by counsel throughout the trial. Jimenez v. State, 717 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1986).
Appellant’s,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Sanne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Irvine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Reyna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Benitez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Blackwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.