Legal Opinion
Hoffer v. Ancel
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 28, 2004No. 03-036PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This appeal arises out of plaintiff Douglas Hoffer’s dispute with the Vermont Department of Taxes (the department) over the department’s adjustments for the years 1999 and 2000 to his education property tax assessments. In March 2002, plaintiff brought suit in the Chittenden Superior Court against Janet Ancel, State Tax Commissioner, and Charles Merriman, a department attorney (defendants), in them individual capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that defendants had violated his due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Diesel v. Town of LewisboroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- John B. Cameron, Jr. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Vermont Golf Association, Inc. v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re Appeal of Investigation Into the Existing Rates of Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Fred Osier and Eugene H. Shaver v. Burlington Telecom, City of Burlington and Jonathan LeopoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.