Legal Opinion

Fred Osier and Eugene H. Shaver v. Burlington Telecom, City of Burlington and Jonathan Leopold

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 11, 2016No. 2014-260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff-taxpayers Fred Osier and Eugene H. Shaver sued defendants to recover and restore to the City of Burlington’s general fund $16.9 million in cost overruns incurred by the City in connection with the operation of Burlington Telecom (BT). BT is a City-owned enterprise that provides an optical fiber-to-the-home network to Burlington residents and businesses. The trial court granted judgment to defendants City of Burlington and the City’s former Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Jonathan Leopold. Taxpayers appeal, challenging the court’s denial of their request for an accounting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Nextel Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Burt v. BlumenauerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Meyncke v. MeynckeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John F. Rawley (Greg Wilson & Maria Shik, Trustee, Appellants) v. Nicholas P. HeymannSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  2. Freihofer v. Vermont Country Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2019
  3. Rochford v. Howard CenterVermont Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API