Snowden v. Kittitas County School District No. 401
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentFinley, J.
(dissenting) — I do not agree with the interpretation of Rem. Rev. Stat., §4706 [P.P.C. § 862-1], in the majority opinion, which, in effect, overturns the jury verdict and the judgment for plaintiff in the trial court.
The pertinent facts as to how six-year-old Donald Snow-den (hereinafter referred to as respondent) was injured are stated in the first several paragraphs of the majority opinion. However, a brief recap here may be helpful.
Respondent, a resident of Kittitas county school district No. 401 (hereinafter referred to as appellant), was a kindergarten pupil in the teachers’ training…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Howard v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Briscoe v. School District No. 123Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Ingersoll v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.