Salinas-Gomez v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
A jury convicted Gonzalo Salinas-Gomez of aggravated assault with intent to rape. On appeal, Gomez contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence pretrial statements he made to a police officer because he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his Miranda1 rights. He further contends the trial court erred in allowing testimony about rape kits generally and about the rape kit performed on the victim, since the results of the victim’s rape kit were not admitted into evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we construe the evidence in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stapleton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Duran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Shelby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Norton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Frank Edwin Norton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013