Duran v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Miguel Angel Duran was found guilty of rape and aggravated sexual battery. He appeals on the grounds that (1) the evidence was insufficient, (2) his statements to the questioning officers were improperly admitted, (3) his trial counsel was ineffective, and (4) the trial court erred by using a court interpreter that was not certified. We find no error and affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that on July 26, 2000 the victim was living in a rented room in Duran’s house. That morning, Duran returned to the residence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Hardeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wesley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Ramos v. TerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.