Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Waldo Griffiths, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
This litigation involves the foreclosure of a mechanic’s hen relating to a public improvement. Plaintiff filed *774notice of lien in the office of the Comptroller of the State of New York, June 4, 1928, and commenced action to foreclose the same July 16, 1928, by personal service of the summons upon the defendant. Defendant answered July 31, 1928. No order extending the life of the hen was ever procured. Notice of pendency of this action has never been filed in Oneida county clerk’s office or with the Comptroller of the State of New York, as required by section 18 of the Lien Law, which is as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Troll v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- William Bradley and Son v. . Henry Huber CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. SidorskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. Kenson Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Siracusa v. Inch Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Gay v. MujicaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964