Legal Opinion
Siracusa v. Inch Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 2, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadigan, J.
1. Statutory provisions included in the Lien Law of the State of New York afford certain protection to those who furnish labor or material for. the improvement of real property. Were it not for such statutes, there would be no such lien as our “ mechanic’s lien.” It follows that, in order to establish such a lien, the statutory prerequisities must be met. For failure to comply with requirements of the Lien Law this plaintiff’s claim must fail so far as he claims a lien. Plaintiff’s notice of lien was not effectual “ for a longer period than one year ” after the notice was filed (Lien Law, §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White Plains Sash & Door Co. v. DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Danziger v. . SimonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- National Lumber Co. v. F. Braun & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- White v. C. M. McLean & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Charles M. Gray Marble & Slate Co. v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. Kenson Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Gay v. MujicaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964