Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mary Lee Orsini v. Virginia Wallace, Warden, Women's Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1990No. 88-2581Published

1DissentBright, Senior Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the Federal Magistrates Act empowers magistrates to enter judgment in habeas cases with the consent of the parties. Unlike the majority, however, I would reach the issue of whether Orsini validly consented to the magistrate’s jurisdiction. Having reached the issue, I would hold that Orsini’s signature on the consent form, without more, did not constitute valid consent. Accordingly, I would remand to the district court and direct the court to consider Orsini’s claims more fully on remand.

I

While as a general rule this court will not consider issues not raised…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Tammy Pfoutz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API