Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Dunnigan v. Cobourn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 12, 1936No. [No. 11, October Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is the second time this case has come before us. In the first appeal, reported in 169 Md. 110, 179 A. 512, we dealt solely with the right of the equitable plaintiffs to exercise their constitutional right of removal, without regard to whether any issues had at that time been raised by the pleadings.

The equitable plaintiffs in the suit are the widow and surviving children, respectively, of Scott Preston Dunnigan, who it is alleged, on the 18th day of March, 1934, was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated upon one of the highways of Harford County by Reese M. Bowman in a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Chandler v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Stasciewicz v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Bennett v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Maryland Ex Rel. Burkhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API