Legal Opinion

Activate v. Washington State Dept. of Rev.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 16, 2009No. 37329-7-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

209 P.3d 524 (2009)

ACTIVATE, INC., Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 37329-7-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

June 16, 2009.

George Carl Mastrodonato, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Heidi A. Irvin, Attorney General's Office/Revenue Div., Olympia, WA, for Respondent.

PENOYAR, J.

¶ 1 Activate filed a refund claim under RCW 82.32.180[1] after paying an assessment of $131,794.29 to the Department of Revenue (DOR) for unpaid use tax on a portion of its cellular telephone inventory. Both DOR and Activate moved for summary judgment and the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. Sprint Spectrum, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Green Collar Club v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Assurance Wireless USA, LP v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Dept. Of Revenue v. Advanced H2O, LLC & Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API