Legal Opinion

Demarest v. Terhune

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 25, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C.

The bill sets forth the following case:

The defendant, Mary E. Terhune, is the widow of the complainants’ testator, Jacob Terhune, deceased. The equitable fights for the enforcement of which this suit is brought arose from a business transaction, in the lifetime of the husband, directly be*664tween the husband and the wife. The parties resided for many years prior -to the year 1899 at East Hackensack, in Bergen county, in this state. The bill states that

“by reason of some difficulty in the marital relations of the said Jacob Terhune and Mary E. Terhune, they had for many years and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. Maeder v. Buffalo Bill's Wild West Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  3. Lang v. LangBergen County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1946
  4. Timmerman v. TimmermanUnited States District Court · 1945
  5. Breidenbach v. BreidenbachNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API