Legal Opinion

Timmerman v. Timmerman

United States District Court

Decided January 30, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sidberman, D. 0. J.

This ■was an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $2-59, being an alleged arrearage under an agreement executed between the respective parties on April 9th, 1941, wherein the defendant-husband agreed to pay to the -plaintiff-wife $7 per week. That such payments were made to the 1st of January, 1944, since which time the defendant herein has been in default. The copy of the agreement is attached to the state of demand and is entitled “In Chancery, &c.,” and is designated as a stipula*53tion. It is signed by the respective litigants and their solicitors.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Halstead v. HalsteadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  2. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Demarest v. TerhuneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  5. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Gilbert v. GilbertSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API