Legal Opinion

Klingman v. Loew's Incorporated

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1941No. 32,623PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The jury could well find the following facts: Plaintiff, who is a film salesman for Republic Pictures Corporation, has a territory including northern Minnesota and all of North Dakota. Walter McKean, similarly employed by defendant, had a territory including North Dakota and certain portions of Minnesota. Each owned and drove his own car, but used it in the business of his employer and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Heffter v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Goar v. Village of StephenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Johnson v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Kvanli v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Hollywood Shop, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API