Legal Opinion

Harbour v. Harbour

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1959No. 5-1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal by the husband from an order of the Chancery Court fixing alimony and impounding funds in the Registry of the Court to secure payment thereof. Some phases of this case have been before us three times previously under the same case style. See opinions dated June 9, 1958 (313 S. W. 2d 830), February 2, 1959, and March 23, 1959. Therefore, we deem it unnecessary to set out fully the background facts.

On July 10, 1958, appellant, the former husband, filed a petition asking the court to reduce the monthly alimony and maintenance payments because he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Casteel v. CasteelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  2. Ring v. RingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Crouch v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Rowell v. RowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Jensen v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Trigo v. RIGGS NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, DCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API