Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The case now here began in this way. Ernest Bowell, the appellant, and Hazel Bowell, the appellee, were married in June, 1929, and separated about the first of the year 1930. The appellant brought suit a short time after the separation to annul the marriage on the ground of fraud practiced by the appellee in its procurement. The appellee answered denying the allegations of fraud, and, cross-complaining, prayed for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, and for alimony. A reply was filed to the eross-complairit denying its allegations, and upon the issues thus joined evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickett v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shatford v. ShatfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Holt v. Werbe Werbe v. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Haller v. HallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Bethune v. BethuneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  5. Harbour v. HarbourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API