Legal Opinion
New York Life Ins. v. Bidoggia
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 4, 1926No. 941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
The question has arisen as to, whether or not the plaintiff should be paid out of the fund deposited in court its costs, including attorney’s fee, which it claims in the amount of $150.
It seems that the original act under which the suit is brought (approved February 22, 1917 [39 Stat. 929; Comp. St. § 991a]) provided that the court should have the power, among other things, “to hear said bill and interpleader and decide thereon according to the practice in equity; to discharge said complainant from further liability upon the pay-' ment of said insurance or benefit as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Groves v. SentellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McNamara v. Provident Sav. Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
- Louisiana State Lottery Co. v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1883
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. KinsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BondurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Du RoureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EckmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Illinois Bankers Life Assur. Co. v. BloodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.